Journal of Radiation Research
Online ISSN : 1349-9157
Print ISSN : 0449-3060
Regular Papers
Dose-response Relationship for Life-shortening and Carcinogenesis in Mice Irradiated at Day 7 Postnatal Age with Dose Range below 1 Gy of Gamma Rays
Shunsaku SASAKINobuo FUKUDA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2006 Volume 47 Issue 2 Pages 135-145

Details
Abstract

This study was designed to elucidate the dose-response relationships for life-shortening and tumorigenic effect in the dose range below 1 Gy of gamma rays delivered during the infant period. Female B6C3F1 mice were irradiated with 0.10, 0.48 or 0.95 Gy at 7 days of age. All irradiated mice were allowed to live out their entire life span together with a simultaneously ongoing control group under a specific pathogen-free condition. Shortening of the mean life span was 1.58% in mice irradiated with 0.10 Gy, which was statistically significant . The coefficient of the linear dose-response relationship for life-shortening was 11.21% Gy-1. The attributable death fraction for all causes of death in 0.10 Gy froup reached 0.092. The excess relative risk for death rate from all causes was 0.102 in the group irradiated with 0.10 Gy. The coefficient of the linear dose-response relationship of the excess relative risk for death rate from all causes was 1.30 Gy-1. The mean number of types of solid tumors at the time of death in mice irradiated with 0.10 Gy was distinctly larger than that in the control group. The excess relative risk for death rate from solid tumors was 0.45 in mice irradiated with 0.10 Gy. The coefficient of the linear dose-response relationship of excess relative risk for death rate from solid tumors was 4.52 Gy-1. Increase in incidences of the pituitary, ovarian and adrenal tumors was observed in mice irradiated with 0.10 Gy. The results of the present study showed that infant mice are susceptible to solid tumor induction, especially of the endocrine organs.

Content from these authors

This article cannot obtain the latest cited-by information.

© 2006 by Journal of Radiation Research Editorial Committee
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top