Journal of Radiation Research
Online ISSN : 1349-9157
Print ISSN : 0449-3060
Lecture Note
Cancer Risks and Low-Level Radiation in U. S. Shipyard Workers
Genevieve M. MATANOSKIJames A. TONASCIAAdolfo CORREA-VILLASEÑORKatherine C. YATESNancy FINKElizabeth ELLIOTTBruce SANDERSDeborah LANTRY
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2008 Volume 49 Issue 1 Pages 83-91

Details
Abstract
The risks for four cancers, leukemia, lymphopoietic cancers (LHC), lung cancer and mesothelioma, were studied in workers from shipyards involved in nuclear powered ship overhauls. The population represented a sample of all workers based on radiation dose at study termination. The final sample included 28,000 workers with ≥ 5.0 mSv, 10,462 workers with < 5.0 mSv and 33,353 non-nuclear workers. Nuclear workers had lower mortality rates for leukemia and LHC than US white males but higher rates of lung cancer and a significant five-fold excess of mesothelioma. Dose-dependent analyses of risks in the high exposure group indicated that for each cancer the risk increased at exposures above 10.0 mSv. An internal comparison of workers with 50.0 mSv exposures to workers with exposures of 5.0-9.9 mSv indicated relative risks for leukemia of 2.41 (95% CI: 0.5, 23.8), for LHC, 2.94 (95% CI: 1.0,12.0), for lung cancer, 1.26 (95% CI: 0.9, 1.9) and for mesothelioma, 1.61 (95% CI: 0.4, 9.7) for the higher exposure group. Except for LHC, these risks are not significant. However, the increasing risk with increasing exposure for these cancers, some of which are known to be related to radiation, suggests that low-level protracted exposures to gamma rays may be associated with these cancers. Other agents such as asbestos, which are common to shipyard work, may play a role especially in the risk of mesothelioma. Future follow up of the population would identify bounds on radiation risks for this population for comparison with similar risks estimated from other populations.
Content from these authors

This article cannot obtain the latest cited-by information.

© 2008 by Journal of Radiation Research Editorial Committee
Previous article
feedback
Top