Journal of Radiation Research
Online ISSN : 1349-9157
Print ISSN : 0449-3060
Regular Papers
Predictive Value of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake by Positron Emission Tomography for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Radiotherapy
Hitoshi IKUSHIMALei DONGJeremy ERASMUSPamela ALLENMary F. MCALEERYan ZHUANGRyohei SASAKIRitsuko KOMAKI
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2010 Volume 51 Issue 4 Pages 465-471

Details
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess predictive value of the positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) for recurrence and survival after radiotherapy (RT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). One hundred forty-nine patients underwent pretreatment PET (n = 67) or PET/computed tomography (CT) (n = 82) and definitive RT for NSCLC. We evaluated the relationship between the maximum-pixel standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and clinical tumor features. Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis (UVA) was used to quantify the risk for local-regional recurrence, distant metastases, and death. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis (MVA) was used to assess the potential independent effect of SUVmax. In the PET group, T1 tumors showed significantly lower SUVmax than T2, T3, and T4 tumors; in the PET/CT group, T1 tumors showed significantly lower SUVmax than T3 and T4 tumors. A high SUVmax was a negative factor for local-regional control (LRC) (p < 0.001), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (p = 0.02), and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.001) on UVA in the PET group. However, the significance decreased to 0.05 for LRC, 0.04 for DMFS, and 0.04 for OS by MVA when tumor size was included in the analysis. A high SUVmax was not a negative factor for LRC, DMFS, or OS on UVA and MVA in the PET/CT group. In conclusion, assessment of predictive value of SUVmax for NSCLC requires consideration of primary tumor size, and the evidence is not sufficient to suggest that FDG uptake in a primary NSCLC provides prognostic information.

Content from these authors

This article cannot obtain the latest cited-by information.

© 2010 by Journal of Radiation Research Editorial Committee
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top