Journal of Radiation Research
Online ISSN : 1349-9157
Print ISSN : 0449-3060
Oncology
FDG-PET/CT-based Gross Tumor Volume Contouring for Radiation Therapy Planning: An Experimental Phantom Study
Ryo TOYARyuji MURAKAMIKuniyuki TASHIROMorikatsu YOSHIDAFumi SAKAMOTOKoichi KAWANAKAShinya SHIRAISHIYuji NAKAGUCHINaoko TSUJITANatsuo OYASeiji TOMIGUCHIYasuyuki YAMASHITA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2012 Volume 53 Issue 2 Pages 338-341

Details
Abstract

As there is continuing controversy over the role of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/CT-fused imaging in radiation therapy (RT) planning, we performed a phantom study to assess the feasibility of FDG-PET/CT-based gross tumor volume (GTV) contouring. The phantom set, consisting of an elliptical bowl and 6 spheres measuring from 10–37 mm in diameter, were filled with FDG to obtain 3 source-to-background ratios (SBRs) of 4, 8, and 16. The ratio to maximum intensity at 5% intervals was applied as the threshold for contouring. The ratio between contoured- and actual volumes (volume ratio) was calculated, and the threshold ratio was selected to provide a volume ratio close to 100%. To consider the clinical application, we applied the threshold value (maximum intensity × threshold ratio) for the largest 37-mm sphere to the 6 spheres. The threshold ratio and the volume ratio in 6 spheres with 3 SBRs were compared using the Friedman test. Threshold ratios ranged from 25–80%; they were higher for smaller spheres (p = 0.003) and lower SBRs (p < 0.001). The volume ratios with the threshold value for the largest 37-mm sphere were lower in smaller spheres (p = 0.010). These results suggest that smaller lesions and higher background activities require a higher threshold ratio and smaller lesions a lower threshold value. FDG-PET/CT-fused imaging should not be used as a single modality but rather to obtain supplemental information in RT planning. The contoured GTV should be adjusted based on clinical data including conventional images.

Content from these authors

This article cannot obtain the latest cited-by information.

© 2012 by Journal of Radiation Research Editorial Committee
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top