Journal of Radiation Research
Online ISSN : 1349-9157
Print ISSN : 0449-3060
Oncology
Assessment of Daily Needle Applicator Displacement during High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer using Daily CT Examinations
Tadashi TAKENAKAKen YOSHIDAMari UEDAHideya YAMAZAKIShunsuke MIYAKEEiichi TANAKAMineo YOSHIDAYasushi YOSHIMURAToshitsugu OKAKazuya HONDA
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

2012 Volume 53 Issue 3 Pages 469-474

Details
Abstract

To improve treatment conformity for prostate cancer, we investigated daily applicator displacement during high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT). Thirty patients treated with HDR-ISBT as monotherapy were examined. All patients received a treatment dosage of 49 Gy per 7 fractions over 4 days. For dose administration, we examined 376 flexible applicators (1128 points) using our unique ambulatory implant technique. Using CT images with a 3-mm slice thickness, we calculated the relative coordinates of the titanium markers and the tips of the applicators. We calculated the distance between the center of gravity of the markers and the tips of the catheters, and compared the distances measured on the day of implantation and the second, third, and fourth treatment days. The mean displacement distance for all applicators was 4.3 ± 3.4 mm, 4.6 ± 4.1 mm, and 5.8 ± 4.5 mm at 21, 45, and 69 hours after initial planning CT. We used a 15-mm margin for needle displacement and only 2 points of 2 patients (16 mm and 18 mm at 69 hours, 2/1128 = 0.2%) exceeded this range. Almost patients (87%) showed the largest displacement within the first 21 hours. The relative doses that covered 100% of CTV (D100(CTV)) values compared with the initial treatment plan were reduced to 0.96 ± 0.08, 0.96 ± 0.08 and 0.94 ± 0.1 at 21, 45 and 69 hours. However, the relative D90(CTV) values kept acceptable levels (1.01 ± 0.02, 1.01 ± 0.03 and 1.01 ± 0.03). Cranial margin of 15 mm seems to be effective to keep D90(CTV) level if we do not do corrective action.

Content from these authors

This article cannot obtain the latest cited-by information.

© 2012 by Journal of Radiation Research Editorial Committee
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top