Journal of Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care
Online ISSN : 2434-219X
Print ISSN : 2185-1085
A comparison of circuit lifespan between original and generic agent of nafamostat mesilate in hemodialysis patients who had been undergone continuous hemodiafiltration just after open cardiovascular surgery
Ryuki KimuraShingo EmaTomoaki MizuguchiKouji MoritaHiroyuki MinetaAkihiko Kato
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2014 Volume 5 Issue 1 Pages 62-65

Details
Abstract

There are many generic drugs of nafamostate mesilate (NM) in Japan, while only a few studies have compared the anticoagulant action of filter and/or circuit patency between the original and generic NMs. So, in this study, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients who had been undergone open cardiovascular surgery. We examined the initial survival time of CHDF filter and circuit in patients who had administered either original NM (Fusan®, Torii Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) (n=22) or generic NM (Coahibitor®, Ajinomoto Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) (n=21). No difference was found in clinical parameters at the beginning of CHDF between the two groups. Mean filter and/or circuit lifespan was also identical between the both groups (1,390±433 vs. 1,225±434 min, p=0.219). The findings suggest that the generic drug has a comparable anticoagulant action to the original one in hemodialysis patients who had started CHDF treatment following open heart surgery. Additional studies will be needed whether the other generic NMs may afford an acceptable hemodiafilter lifespan in patients at a higher risk of filter and/or circuit coagulation.

Content from these authors
© 2014, Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top