Journal of Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care
Online ISSN : 2434-219X
Print ISSN : 2185-1085
The influence of nafamostat mesilate administration on the lifetime of AN69ST-continuous hemofiltration
Yasuyoshi KurimotoYoshitaka HaraTakahiro KawajiSeiko HayakawaTomoyuki NakamuraHidefumi KomuraChizuru YamashitaJunpei ShibataOsamu Nishida
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2017 Volume 8 Issue 1 Pages 48-53

Details
Abstract

Continuous hemofiltration (AN-CHF) using an AN69ST hemofilter often causes blood coagulation in the venous chamber. We have postulated that this is due to the adsorption of nafamostat mesilate (NM), although this remains to be investigated. In our ICU, only prefilter NM administration was previously employed, but, subsequently, pre- and post-filter NM administration were introduced. Sepsis patients who received AN-CHF were selected and compared retrospectively regarding the administration methods (Method A: prefilter administration of NM at 30mg/hr; Method AV:prefilter at 25mg/hr and postfilter at 5mg/hr). Considering time loss due to CHF exchange and the inconvenience of exchange off duty, we defined cases where AN-CHF was performed for more than 22 hours with a single filter as “target achievement.” As a result, no significant difference was noted in lifetimes (23.5 hours for Method A vs. 23.2 hours for Method AV, p=0.60) or target achievement rates (85.1% for Method A vs. 78.9% for Method AV, p=0.34). Sequential organ failure assessment scores (odds ratio: 0.997, p=0.0002) and Method AV (odds ratio: 0.216, p=0.011) were included as factors contributing to target achievement. In conclusion, the divided administration of NM prefilter at 25mg/hr and postfilter at 5mg/hr was not effective for circuit lifetime in this study.

Content from these authors
© 2017, Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top