Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi
Online ISSN : 1883-082X
Print ISSN : 1340-3451
ISSN-L : 1340-3451
The optimal ratio of extracellular water to total body water (ECW/TBW) determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) for setting dry weight in hemodialysis patients
Nobuhiro SasakiKoushi UenoTakeshi ShiraishiAkio YoshimuraMunehiro KunoShinichi TakedaTakako SaitouYasuhiro AndouEiji Kusano
Author information
Keywords: ECW/TBW, dry weight
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2008 Volume 41 Issue 10 Pages 723-730

Details
Abstract
Recently, we have reported that bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) using a body composition analyzer (InBody S20) is useful for assessing the body fluid components of hemodialysis patients. The ratio of extracellular water (ECW) to total body water (TBW) appears to be a useful marker for estimating clinical dry weight (Cl-DW). The present study investigated the optimal ECW/TBW ratio for setting DW under various clinical conditions such as diabetes, heart failure, hypoalbuminemia, dialysis-related hypotension, obesity, long-term dialysis, and non-oliguric HD patients. The subjects comprised 57 patients who were undergoing maintenance dialysis. In addition to routine blood test, various body fluid components using an InBody S20 were measured before and after dialysis. Furthermore, we measured the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) on chest Xp, and human atrial natriuretic peptide (hANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) on cardiac ultrasonography after dialysis. The ECW/TBW ratio significantly decreased after dialysis under all clinical conditions (p<0.0001). The post-dialysis ECW/TBW ratio was negatively correlated with the serum albumin concentration (r=-0.720, p<0.0001), and it was higher in diabetic patients than in non-diabetic patients (p<0.0001). Thus, we divided the patients into 4 groups based on the presence or absence of diabetes (DM) and hypoalbuminemia (hypo Alb). The post-dialysis ECW/TBW ratio was significantly higher in GroupII (DM (-), hypo Alb (+) ; 0.397±0.013, p<0.001) and GroupIII (DM (+), hypo Alb (-) ; 0.398±0.011, p<0.001), compared to that in GroupI (DM (-), hypo Alb (-) ; 0.384±0.005). The highest value was obtained from GroupIV (DM(+), hypo Alb(+) ; 0.404±0.012, p<0.0001 vs. GroupI). There was a strong positive correlation between BIA-DW, which is equal to the BW when the ECW/TBW ratio is 0.380, and Cl-DW (r=0.996, p<0.0001). These values were almost identical in GroupI. On the contrary, Cl-DW was approximately 0.5~0.8kg greater than BIA-DW in GroupII and GroupIII, and approximately 1kg greater in GroupIV. The post-dialysis ECW/TBW ratio did not correlate with blood pressure, heart function, duration of dialysis or urinary volume. In conclusion, the post-dialysis ECW/TBW ratio determined by BIA may be a useful marker for predicting DW in hemodialysis patients with various clinical backgrounds.
Content from these authors
© 2008 The Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top