Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi
Online ISSN : 1883-082X
Print ISSN : 1340-3451
ISSN-L : 1340-3451
Clinical evaluations of β2-microglobulin adsorbing Lixelle columns; S-15 and S-35 A multi-center study
Fumitake GejyoIzumi AmanoRyoichi NakazawaTsutomu AnzaiNoritomo ItamiSeishi InoueSeiichi ObayashiSeiji OhiraYasuhiko OyabuToshihiko OnoYoshikazu KatoYutaka KannoMasao KimTakeshi KobayashiMorihiro KondoMotoyoshi SatoJeongsoo ShinMasashi SuzukiHachiro SenoSusumu TakahashiToshio TagumaYoshiaki TakemotoShuichi TsutsuiShinji NakayamaShigeko HaraHideo HidaiToru HyodoTetsuya MatsushimaYoshihiro MotomiyaHiroyuki MoritaKunihiko Yoshiya
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2003 Volume 36 Issue 2 Pages 117-123

Details
Abstract
We applied β2-microglobulin adsorbing Lixelle column of different sizes (Lixelle S-15: 65mL of priming volume, S-35: 177mL of priming volume) to patients (S-15: 28 males and 38 females; S-35: 29 males and 24 females) with dialysis-related amyloidosis (DRA), and compared the incidence of adverse effects, the degree of improvement in clinical symptoms such as joint pain, and β2-microglobulin adsorbing efficiency between Lixelle S-15 and S-35 columns. The incidence of adverse effects such as hypovolemia or decrease in hematocrit was reduced in Lixelle S-15 (8%) compared to that (25%) in Lixelle S-35. Lixelle S-15 exhibited about 90% (vs S-35) efficiency in adsorption of β2-microglobulin combined with high-performance membrane dialyzer and the same efficacy as with S-35 in improvement of clinical symptoms. Change from S-15 to S-35 was necessary for some patients due to worsening shoulder pain. Lixelle S-15 was considered useful for patients with DRA to whom Lixelle S-35 is not applicable because of adverse effects.
Content from these authors
© The Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top