Japanese Journal of Endourology
Online ISSN : 2187-4700
Print ISSN : 2186-1889
ISSN-L : 2186-1889
[title in Japanese]
[in Japanese][in Japanese][in Japanese][in Japanese][in Japanese][in Japanese]
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2012 Volume 25 Issue 2 Pages 299-304

Details
Abstract
  Purpose:To evaluated the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy(LPN), we compared the results of ischemic LPN with hilar occlusion (ischemia group)and non-ischemic LPN using microwave tissue coagulator(non-ischemia group).
  Methods:Between April 1994 and April 2010, 54 patients underwent pure LPN. We retrospectively made a comparative review of perioperative complication and postoperative renal function between two procedures. Results:The patients with complication who received non-ischemic LPN developed prolonged urine leakage and finally, he required nephrectomy due to uncontrollable infection.
  Postoperative estimated GFR in non-ischemia group was significantly worth than that in ischemia group at 3 months after operation.
  Conclusion:The thermal damage by Microwave tissue coagulator may unexpectedly broad and deep. Although non-ischemic LPN using microwave tissue coagulator is technically easy, it should be restricted to use for the small superficial renal tumors.
Content from these authors
© 2012 Japanese Society of Endourology
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top