Equilibrium Research
Online ISSN : 1882-577X
Print ISSN : 0385-5716
ISSN-L : 0385-5716
Original articles
Comparison of stabilometric findings in the closed parallel feet position and with each foot placed at 30° with heels in contact with each other
Manabu KataokaTomoe YosidaAyami ShimizuKenji IyamaMasahiko YamamotoMitsuya Suzuki
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2018 Volume 77 Issue 2 Pages 58-63

Details
Abstract

 Inspection methods for stabilometry differ between Japan and overseas countries. In Japan, the closed parallel feet position is used, whereas various positions are used abroad, such as with feet parallel to each other at some distance and with each foot placed at 30° with heels in contact with each other. Further, arm postures include arms extended laterally, the folded arms posture, and others. In the present study, we performed stabilometry tests using various feet positions. Participants were 64 healthy subjects (males, 42; females, 22; mean age, 33.5 years) without a history of vertigo or balance disorders. Stabilometry with the closed parallel feet position and each foot placed at 30° was recorded with eyes open and eyes closed for 60 seconds each. Many parameters were low with each foot placed at 30° compared to the closed parallel feet position. Further, there was a significant difference (p<0.01) in total length (cm) with eyes open and eyes closed, and a significant decrease in area (cm2) with eyes open (p<0.05) and with eyes closed (p<0.01). Using the velocity of 8 directions, we obtained a ratio of left-right/anterior-posterior vector, with the closed parallel feet position found to be significantly higher (p<0.01) than with each foot placed at 30° both with eyes open and eyes closed. These results indicate that the closed parallel feet position is an unstable posture associated with more sway than each foot placed at 30°. Therefore, the closed parallel feet position may be more suitable for clinical use because it allows the detection of minute changes in the center of posture.

Content from these authors
© 2018 Japan Society for Equilibrium Research
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top