JAPANESE JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC ENDOSCOPY
Online ISSN : 1884-5746
Print ISSN : 1884-9938
Original article
Pregnancy rates following endometrial polyp removal: A comparison of resectoscopes and the Lin polyp snare system
Satoshi TakedaSatoshi TanimuraHiroshi HunamotoSatoshi NomuraYuri KusabirakiTakashi HosonoTakayoshi SumitaniYasushi SitanoMasao NakajimaRie MinamiYuka AmetaniTakashi Nakano
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2016 Volume 32 Issue 1 Pages 179-183

Details
Abstract

Introduction: Endometrial polyps can cause infertility and their removal is recommended. Transcervical resection (TCR), which is commonly selected, is performed using a resectoscope under anesthesia. Recently, use of the Lin snare system (Snare) has been reported for polyp removal without anesthesia. Snare uses a diagnostic flexible hysteroscope with an outer diameter of 3.1 mm. However, the effects on infertility are unclear. We investigated infertile patients with endometrial polyps at our hospital and compared pregnancy rates based on the two different methods.

Materials and Methods: Between January 2008 and April 2014, we analyzed 64 patients who were postoperatively followed-up for at least 12 months. The patient backgrounds and pregnancy rates were investigated retrospectively for both groups. TCR was performed under general anesthesia, with hospitalization. Snare was used with no anesthesia and no cervical dilatation on an outpatient basis. Since the introduction of Snare at our hospital in 2012, it has been the first choice.

Results: No significant differences were observed between both groups for patient backgrounds. Pregnancy rates were 42.9% (21/49) in the TCR group and 60.0% (9/15) in the Snare group, indicating no significant difference. Five patients underwent both procedures. The two patients treated with Snare for post-TCR recurrence were both pregnant, and two of three patients who underwent additional TCR following difficulties with Snare were pregnant.

Conclusions: Our study indicated that the pregnancy rate after using Snare was not inferior to that after TCR. Our results suggested that Snare could be useful for polyp removal in the treatment of patients with infertility.

Content from these authors
© 2016 Japan Society of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Therapy
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top