JAPANESE JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC ENDOSCOPY
Online ISSN : 1884-5746
Print ISSN : 1884-9938
Original article
A Comparative Study Between Abdominal Field Block and Patient-controlled Epidural Anesthesia after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Seina HoriYutoku ShiYuka EjimaTomohiro UedaKyoko HayashidaShinsuke Mochizuki
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2018 Volume 34 Issue 1 Pages 62-69

Details
Abstract

Objective: The objective of this clinical study was to compare abdominal field block to patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH).

Methods: Forty patients who underwent TLH at our hospital from July to September 2015 and from September 2016 to January 2017 were divided into two groups. The patients in group A received rectus sheath and transversus abdominis plane block, and those in group B received PCEA. Post-operative pain was followed for 2 days after surgery and evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and during activity. The frequency of analgesic use was also monitored.

Results: VAS scores at rest in group A were significantly higher than those in group B at 6 hours and 2 days after surgery.

VAS scores during activity in group A were significantly higher at all time points (6 hours, 1 day, and 2 days after surgery). However, there were no significant differences in VAS scores at rest between the two groups at 1 hour, 3 hours, and 1 day after surgery.

The patients in group A required significantly more analgesics than those in group B.

Conclusion: Abdominal field block after TLH seems less effective compared to PCEA, especially during activity after surgery.

Content from these authors
© 2018 Japan Society of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Therapy
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top