JAPANESE JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC ENDOSCOPY
Online ISSN : 1884-5746
Print ISSN : 1884-9938
Original article
Prognostic outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy vs. total abdominal hysterectomy for early-stage endometrial carcinoma
Maiko Ueda, Kyouhei Irue, Naoko Tanaka, Saki Katayama, Keiji Morikawa, Rinko Kubo, Naoyuki Ida, Yousuke Katayama, Masae Yorimitsu, Junichi Kodama
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2020 Volume 36 Issue 1 Pages 66-69

Details
Abstract

Objectives: Laparoscopic hysterectomy is currently performed in a large number of patients. We investigated the recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival rates of laparoscopic vs. abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer.

Methods: The study included 240 patients with stage IA endometrial cancer (endometrial adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma G1/G2) who underwent surgical treatment between 2007 and 2017. Laparoscopy was performed in 97 (laparoscopy group [L group]) and laparotomy in 143 patients (laparotomy group [O group]). We performed an intergroup comparison of recurrence, DFS, and overall survival rates.

Results: No intergroup differences were observed in recurrence (5.2% [L group] vs. 7.3% [O group]), DFS (90.3% [L group] vs. 94.1% [O group]), and overall survival rates (98.8% [L group] vs. 97.3% [O group]).

Conclusions: Long-term prognosis of laparoscopic surgery was not inferior to that of laparotomy for early-stage endometrial cancer.

Content from these authors
© 2020 Japan Society of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Therapy
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top