JAPANESE JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC ENDOSCOPY
Online ISSN : 1884-5746
Print ISSN : 1884-9938
Case report
3 cases of endometrial cancer that endometrial cytology was negative but doubted in hysteroscope views
Hiroko Yoshida, Keiko Kataoka, Sayaka Matsueda, Tomoteru Tsuda, Shinji Kohno
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2020 Volume 36 Issue 2 Pages 331-336

Details
Abstract

Introduction: An endometrial polyp is a benign clinical finding, but distinguishing a polyp from a malignancy, such as endometrial cancer, can be difficult1) . We report three cases of endometrial cancer, the endometrial cytology was negative, but the definitive diagnosis was established hysteroscopic appearance.

Case 1-3: Three women were referred to our hospital for evaluation of an endometrial polyp or endometrial thickening. Every endometrial cytology was negative. We performed a hysteroscopy and suspected endometrial cancer based on nodular or papillary or polypoid tumor with abnormal surface vessels for each patient. We performed a hysteroscopic biopsy of the mass and an endometrial curettage to each patient. Every pathologic diagnosis were endometrioid carcinoma (G1/G2).

Conclusion: For an in utero mass which does not lead to a diagnosis based on images and examinations, such as a MRI of the uterus, hysteroscopy can facilitate the diagnosis.

Content from these authors
© 2020 Japan Society of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Therapy
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top