JAPANESE JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC ENDOSCOPY
Online ISSN : 1884-5746
Print ISSN : 1884-9938
Original article
Comparison of robot-assisted vs conventional laparoscopy vs laparotomy for aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer
Kensaku Furuii, Jotaro Moroi, Tatsushito Furi, Maino Kan, Msafumi Kuroyanagi, Yurika Yamada, Satoru Katsuki, Kota Umemura
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2025 Volume 41 Issue 1 Pages 21-26

Details
Abstract

Background: Since 2015, our hospital has been performing robot-assisted laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for stage IA endometrial adenocarcinoma G3 and highly malignant histological types, as well as stages IB and II. In this study, we compared safety of robot-assisted surgery with laparoscopic and open surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 49 cases of patients who underwent para-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer between April 2016 and March 2024.

Results: For robot-assisted surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and open surgery, respectively, the median age and BMI were 56 years (range 43-69 years) and 21.8 (range 17.8-32.7), 54 years (range 28-68 years) and 22.9 (range 14.5-32.1), and 58 years (range 34-72 years) and 21.7 (range 15.3-24.6); the median operative time, blood loss, and number of lymph nodes removed were 264 minutes (range 213-326 minutes), 10 mL (range 10-50 mL), and 40 nodes (range 18-76 nodes), 297 minutes (range 288-366 minutes), 96 mL (range 10-400 mL), and 46 nodes (range 23-76 nodes), and 229 minutes (range 123-454 minutes), 833.5 mL (range 256-2,367 mL), and 34 nodes (range 11-54 nodes); the postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (range 3-7 days), 4 days, and 7 days (range 5-18 days). Intraoperative complications occurred in 1 case of laparoscopic surgery, while postoperative complications were seen in 5 cases of robot assisted surgery and 5 cases of open surgery.

Conclusion: Robot-assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy for stage IA endometrial adenocarcinoma G3 and highly malignant histological types, as well as stages IB and II, appears to be a superior surgical technique in terms of surgical outcomes and safety compared to conventional methods.

Content from these authors
© 2025 Japan Society of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Therapy
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top