The History of Economic Thought
Online ISSN : 1884-7358
Print ISSN : 1880-3164
ISSN-L : 1880-3164
Survey Article
Methodology and Philosophy of Economics
A Tale of Two Biases
Luis Mireles-FloresMichiru Nagatsu
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2022 Volume 64 Issue 1 Pages 33-57

Details
Abstract

This article comprises an up-to-date critical review of the field known as Economic Methodology or Philosophy of Economics (EM/PE). Two edited volumes (Kincaid and Ross 2021; Heilmann and Reiss 2021), a special issue of the Journal of Economic Methodology (2021), and a recent bibliometric analysis of the field (Claveau et al. 2021) constitute the basis of the review. Drawing on these sources, we identify a number of problematic trends in current EM/PE research. We claim that these trends could be interpreted as two kinds of biases, namely a micro-level bias and a mainstream bias. We discuss the respective details of these biases and their normative implications for the discipline.

Content from these authors
© 2022 The Japanease Society for the History of Economic Thought
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top