Journal of The Showa University Society
Online ISSN : 2188-529X
Print ISSN : 2187-719X
ISSN-L : 2187-719X
Original
EFFECT OF ACTIVE LEARNING STUDY IN MEASURING VITAL SIGNS:
TRIAL OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING OF 3 DEPARTMENTS
Akiko TANAKAAmane OTAKIAkiko OKAMOTOMamiko YAMADADaisuke NAKAMURAHiroyuki SHIMIZUKosei MITSUHASHI
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2017 Volume 77 Issue 1 Pages 59-67

Details
Abstract

The recent seminar, held by students wishing to perform voluntary training, facilitated assessment of the education effectiveness of the learning process. The subjects were students of Nursing, Occupational Therapy and Physical Therapy Departments (n=35), classified it into a combined three departmental collaborative group (cooperation G) and a control group nursing department alone group (independent G). The seminar was held two times. At the first seminar, the facilitators were students. At the second seminar, the facilitators were teachers. After each seminar, students provided descriptive answers and self-evaluation. To analyze the results, a self-evaluation table was compiled, and descriptive contents were collated. For data analysis, simple summarization was performed from the self-evaluation table and statistical processing was performed.The description questionnaire was analyzed using text mining manufactured by Mathematical Systems Corporation. Considering particular questions, such as “Both the brachial artery running and the center of the rubber capsule can be aligned” the results were significantly higher in both groups. And considering “Practical items”, such as “normal / abnormal blood pressure measurement can be judged” the results were significantly higher in the Independent Group, but the Cooperation G showed no significant change. Cooperation Group showed significantly higher results than in the Independent Group, which can be checked as to whether there is a change in the state of the patient after the execution of “in the communication” item. In the post questionnaire, a strong association was shown in “group learning”, “good” and “seminar” in the Collaboration Group, and clear Group features were not shown in the Independent Group. Three studies collaborate to assess the lack of knowledge in the learning process, and as a result, even though the number of times it was repeated, it did not lead to an increase in self-evaluation. The questionnaire result of Collaboration Group, indicated the relevance of the words expanded. These are thought to be the effects of 3 departmental collaborative learning.

Content from these authors
© 2017 The Showa University Society
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top