Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine
Online ISSN : 1882-966X
Print ISSN : 1340-7988
ISSN-L : 1340-7988
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Accuracy of short-duration creatinine clearance in critically ill patients: 24-hour versus one-hour creatinine clearance
Hirofumi IwataKenji UeharaKaoru MatsuyamaNoriko TeradaMakoto TakatoriKeiichi Tada
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2015 Volume 22 Issue 4 Pages 247-252

Details
Abstract
Measurement of creatinine clearance (CCr) is widely used for the evaluation of kidney function. However, CCr measured with diuresis for 24 hours (24hrCCr) is time-consuming. While there have been reports on measurement of CCr with samples of urine collected in shorter intervals, there has been few reports on an one-hour urine sample for CCr measurement (1hrCCr). We compared 24hrCCr, as the standard measure, with 1hrCCr. Forty-two patients had 56 complete sets of 24hrCCr and 1hrCCr values. Agreement between methods was assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. Multivariate analysis was performed by multiple linear regression to identify independent etiologic factors associated with the percentage change between 24hrCCr and 1hrCCr. There was a significant correlation between 24hrCCr and 1hrCCr (r=0.72, P<0.0001) . Bias was 14.2 ml/min, and 95% limits of agreement were -59.8 to 88.2 ml/min. After multivariate analysis, the factors significantly associated with percentage change between 24hrCCr and 1hrCCr was urine creatinine concentration in the one-hour urine collection (P=0.015) , change in urine volume before the one-hour urine collection (P<0.0001) and change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (P=0.0002) . 1hrCCr is not an adequate substitute for 24hrCCr in an ICU setting. The discrepancy between 24hrCCr and 1hrCCr may be caused by measurement error and dynamic changes in kidney function.
Content from these authors
© 2015 The Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top