Abstract
1) Analysis of National Land Agency using people's satisfaction proves that improvement of facilities on living environment in farm district mainly composed of hill and mountainious areas is still far behind that in urban district.
2) Although the report of National Land Agency states that improvement of social capital should be changed from civil-minimum to amenity-minimum, civil-minimum improvement has not yet been fully implemented in farm district.
3) The report also states that every municipality can be classified into any development atages of urban area. However, urban area should not be the final development stage of farm district as farm district has different development stages from urban area considering financial capability of municipality.
4) Investment effect is higher in farm district while it is decreasing in urban area. Signification of improvement of social capital in farm district is very important.
5) Agricultural environmental improvement survey states that every municipality strongly demands total and comprehensive improvement of foundation for agricultural productivity as well as improvement of facilities on living environment. In case of implementation, comprehending the real state of region and financial support are important.
6) Agricultural infrastructure improvement has also development stages of improvement. It is important to draw final development aspect of farm district for implementation of improvement.
