Abstract
My particular view about Russian nuclear energetic perspectives is presented. The nearest and the further perspectives are considered. The arguments are adduced that the most probable scenario of nuclear energetic development is its stabilization in the near future. For further development the arguments of supporters and opponents of nuclear energetic are analyzed. Three points of view are considered. The first point of view that there is not alternative for nuclear energetic. My notes are the following ones. a) I express a skeptic opinion about a statement of quick exhaustion of fossil organic fuel recourses and corresponding estimations are presented. b) It is expressed skeptic opinion about the statement that nuclear energetic can have a visual influence on "team effect". c) I agree that nuclear energetic is the most ecological technology for normal work but however we can't disregard possibilities of catastrophic accidents. The second point of view that the use of nuclear energetic can't have the justification. I adduce the arguments contrary to this statement. The third point of view that nuclear energetic is a usual technology and the only criteria for discussions about what dimension and where one ought develop it is total cost of its unit. Expressed an opinion that the deceived for the choose of a way the skill of the estimate correctly and optimized so named the external parts of the unit energy costs for different energy technologies.
