Abstract
The paper presents two types of a passive safety containment for a near future BWR. They are tentatively named Mark S and Mark X containment in the paper. One of their common merits is very low peak pressure at severe accidents without venting the containment atmosphere to the environment. The PCV pressure can be moderated within the design pressure. Another merit is the capability to submerge the PCV and the RPV above the core level. The third merit is robustness against external events such as a large commercial airplane. The both containments have a passive cooling core catcher that has radial cooling channels. The Mark S containment is made of reinforced concrete and applicable to a large power BWR up to 1830 MWe. The Mark X containment has the steel secondary containment and can be cooled by natural circulation of outside air. It can accommodate a medium power BWR up to 1380 MWe. In both cases the plants have active and passive safety systems constituting in-depth hybrid safety (IDHS). Although the plant concept discussed in the paper uses well-established technology, plant performance including economy is evolutionally improved. Nothing is new in the hardware but everything is new in the performance.
