Abstract
In this paper I tried to show some propositions on scientific character. First, methodology debates in Germany were taken a general view, next, views by representatives of business administration methodology, Yamamoto, Takada and Urabe were considered. I could make following propositions relating to the way that physical educational management should be when summarized determinations of scientific charactor and it's grounds in theoretical studies of educational administration and business administration. 1) Practical or technical studies should be advanced on the basis of explanatory theory, but they are significant. Physical educational management is a practical science that does't only judge(appraise) the purposefulness and the efficiency of existing the purpose and means of management, but also aims at creating & forming new purpose and means are not exist & used as yet. 2) To be exact normative science determine and criticize the purpose of business administration was regarded as unscience because of doing the value judgement. But the purpose of management should be an object of theory of physical educational management, because (1)it is examined by a principle of not value judgement but value relebance, (2) there is a "problematik" (practical requirements) behind problems of physical educational management, (3)the way of new purpose of management is demanded in changeble modern times. 3) The essence of the theory itself is difference between pure-theoretical science and practical-theoretical scinece. Pure-theoretical scinece has a ultimate purposes to recognize laws of the phenomena on the basis of analytic thinking. In physical educational management that is a practical-theorical science we should see the phenomena of physical educational manegement as "integrated whole" by synthetic mode of thinking. The it is not complete in theory building, but required to have a close connection with theories of the technology and the policy.
