Journal of Japanese Society of Oral Implantology
Online ISSN : 2187-9117
Print ISSN : 0914-6695
ISSN-L : 0914-6695
Special Articles : Long Term Prognosis of Implant Treatment in Esthetic Zone
Considerations for Long-term Prognosis of Implant Treatments in the Esthetic Zone
Toyohiko HIDAKAYukihiko HIDAKAYuka NAKAMURAEiki SHIMIZU
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2019 Volume 32 Issue 4 Pages 276-284

Details
Abstract

To ensure that patients are satisfied with the esthetic outcomes of implant treatment, it is not only essential to restore the crown of the tooth but also to ensure that the peripheral gingiva and interdental papillae are well positioned for long-term stability. To achieve these goals, it is important to secure sufficient bone (hard tissue) and soft tissue at the implant site. Although there are individual differences, it is generally accepted that if the implant and abutment have the same diameter, at least 2 mm of bone must be secured on the buccolingual (labiopalatine) side of the implant, or at least 1.5 mm in the case of platform switching, with at least 1.5 mm between the implant and natural teeth and at least 3 mm between two implants, depending on the design that is used. As it is thought that peri-implant soft tissue must be around 4 mm in height, many authorities suggest that if the implant and abutment have the same diameter the implant insertion depth must be around 3 mm deeper than the peripheral gingiva in the apical direction, and around 4 mm deeper if platform switching is used. The required thickness of buccolingual (labiopalatine) soft tissue is believed to be around 2 mm. The shape of the superstructure is concave below the gingival margin to secure the required thickness of buccolingual (labiopalatine) soft tissue, and the halfpontic technique can be used for the abutment shape using the same method as for tooth restoration. If insufficient tissue is present, it must be augmented ; however, in consideration of long-term esthetic prognosis, a slowly resorbable or nonresorbable bone substitute should be used for bone augmentation, while for soft tissues autologous grafts maintain augmentation over the long term.

Content from these authors
© 2019 Japanese Society of Oral Implantology
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top