Journal of Japanese Society of Oral Implantology
Online ISSN : 2187-9117
Print ISSN : 0914-6695
ISSN-L : 0914-6695
Original Papers
Effects of the Connection Design between Implants and Abutments on Bending Load
Atsuo UEMATSU, Ryuichi USUI, Tetsuya NAGAI, Kenju NATORI, Munekata SASO, Natsuki NAKAJIMA, Takamitsu YOSHIDA, Michio ITO
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2024 Volume 37 Issue 2 Pages 145-154

Details
Abstract

Purpose : This study examined the effects of implant connection design and inclination angle on bending load.

Materials and Methods : Experimental implants were manufactured using a type 4 titanium cementable abutment (TP), straight abutment type (IA) and an inclination of 5° type (IB) with internal taper joint. Bending load and deflection amount were measured for five implants each, using a universal testing machine, at inclination angles of 10°, 20°, and 30°. An analysis of variance was performed to compare significant differences among several groups and Tukeyʼs multiple comparison test (critical rate : 5%). After measurement, each specimen was observed by CT.

Results : The approximate bending load at an inclination angle of 10° was 5,060 N for TP, 3,850 N for IB, and 3,030 N for IA, which was the smallest, with significant differences (p<0.001) observed among the implants. At an inclination angle of 20°, the approximate bending load was 1,640 N for TP, and those for IA and IB were 1,420 N, with significant differences observed between TP-IA (p<0.001) and TP-IB (p<0.001), respectively. The approximate bending load at an inclination angle of 30° was 910 N for TP, 870 N for IA, and 840 N for IB, with significant differences observed between TP-IA (p<0.001), IA-IB (p<0.001), and IA-IB (p=0.008), respectively. The deflection value was 0.49-0.68 mm at an inclination angle of 10°, with significant differences observed between TP-IA (p<0.001) and IA-IB (p<0.001), respectively. At an inclination angle of 20°, the deflection value was 0.56-0.61 mm with no significant difference observed, and at an inclination angle of 30°, it was 0.70-0.84 mm with significant differences observed between TP-IA (p=0.004) and TP-IB (p<0.001), respectively. CT observations showed gaps between the abutment and collar part at inclination angles of 20° and 30° in each specimen.

Conclusion : It was revealed that the connection method and angle of inclination affected bending load, amount of deflection, and the formation of gaps in the connecting parts.

Content from these authors
© 2024 Japanese Society of Oral Implantology
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top