Abstract
We reported about mobility of implants by PERIO TEST® (Part 1, 2) on SUMICIKON. We took many measurements of Bonefit bioinart implants with PERIO TEST® (PT) by the same method. PT revealed that a relation between an implant and a bone can be understood by individual observation at chairside.
Our Bonefit implant dates were reliable statistics, because we measured 205 cases. We had some interesting results about some methods. Those results were as follows;
1. Incisal lower edentulos arch use (n=19) PT average had the best level when compared to other methods.
2. Self-standing use (n=29) PT average had a good level but was impossible to use clinically.
3. Connected natural teeth and Molar lower arch use (n=113) was the most popular method in our experiments. The PT average was good. We thought, this method was safe and reliable.
4. Connected natural teeth and Molar upper arch use (n=41) PT average was alright for clinical use. But standard deviation was not better than the other methods
5. All experiments (n=205) PT average rose from immediate post operation to 30 days later. But it declined after 60 days later. The phenomenon was“ Tissue-integrate”.
