Journal of Japanese Society of Oral Oncology
Online ISSN : 1884-4995
Print ISSN : 0915-5988
ISSN-L : 0915-5988
Symposium 3: TNM classification of oral cancer
How to classify N? (Original Article)
Yasuyuki MichiYuuko KatsukiMiho MizutaniChika MiuraYoshio OhyamaKunihiro MyouNarikazu UzawaMasashi YamashiroSatoshi Yamaguchi
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2016 Volume 28 Issue 3 Pages 103-108

Details
Abstract
Purpose: We performed a clinical study to evaluate the N classification.
Materials and methods: 281 cases of primary oral squamous cell carcinoma, which were surgically resected with neck dissection, were selected. Cases with pre-operative radiotherapy or that recurred after the surgery, were excluded.
Clinical examination and images such as US, CT, MRI, and PET/CT were used to diagnose metastasis of neck lymph nodes.
We studied the concordance rate of the clinical classification (cN), which expresses the existence and developed area of neck lymph node metastasis, and histopathological classification (pN). We also examined the accuracy of diagnostic tools.
Results: The concordance rate of cN and pN classification was 60.5%. cN1 showed the lowest concordance (30.2%).
The highest specificity of diagnostic accuracy was US, 86.3%, and the highest sensitivity was PET/CT, 74.7%.
Conclusions: It is necessary to select diagnostic tools based on their characteristics for accurate diagnosis for N classification.
Content from these authors
© 2016 Japanese Society of Oral Oncology
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top