Journal of Japanese Society of Oral Oncology
Online ISSN : 1884-4995
Print ISSN : 0915-5988
ISSN-L : 0915-5988
Symposium 5: Salvage operation of oral cancer
Salvage surgery for recurrent or residual oral and maxillofacial cancer following induction chemotherapy(Review Article)
Michihiro UedaTetsuro YamashitaShin RinTomoyuki KougoShuuichi HosokawaShinnosuke YamashitaTakashi NiiyamaYoritoshi Nakajima
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2016 Volume 28 Issue 4 Pages 225-231

Details
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the outcomes of patients with stage IV advanced oral and maxillofacial cancer (OMFC) primarily treated with induction chemotherapy using TPF (TPF-ICT), and the efficacies of salvage surgical treatment. Forty-nine cases were treated with TPF-ICT. The therapy is very effective against OMFC, but the side effects are very severe.
The response rate for primary region and cervical region cancers were 57.1% and 65%, respectively.
The most commonly observed Grade 3-4 side effects included leucopenia (75.5%), hemoglobin decrease (32.7%), and thrombocytopenia (22.4%). Other toxicities included renal failure, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Neuropathy was diagnosed in 19 (38%) patients.
If the response is poor or the side effects are severe, the therapy will be followed by another therapy such as radiotherapy or surgical therapy. Six cases received salvage surgery following TPF-RT (radiotherapy) and 31 cases received salvage surgery following TPF alone.
Patients with OMFC who received salvage surgery following TPF alone (31 cases) and CCRT-HFT (42 cases) were compared. The operation time, hemorrhage volume, complications, and success rate of free flap were not different in the two groups.
In the two groups (TPF-ICT vs. CCRT-HFT), survival analysis after salvage surgery was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the 2- and 3-year overall survival rates were (70.5% vs. 52.1%) and (59.2% vs. 50%), respectively.
The efficacy of TPF-ICT against advanced OMFC was suggested in this study.
Content from these authors
© 2016 Japanese Society of Oral Oncology
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top