ORAL THERAPEUTICS AND PHARMACOLOGY
Online ISSN : 1884-4928
Print ISSN : 0288-1012
ISSN-L : 0288-1012
Clinical Comparative Study of Anti-emetic Effects of Granisetron Hydrochloride v.s. Tropisetron Hydrochloride capsule for Chemotherapy in Oral Cancer Patients
AKIKO KUMAGAIJUN SAKOHTOMONO OHTSUKAWATARU MURAOKAKIMIO UCHIYAMA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2000 Volume 19 Issue 2 Pages 51-61

Details
Abstract
CDDP, commonly used to treat oral cancer, frequently induces adverse effects, such as severe anorexia, nausea, and emesis associated with chemotherapy. Recently, several 5-HT3receptor antagonists have developed, and among them, Granisetron hydrochrolide injection has been widely used so far. Tropisetron hydrochrolide, an oral anti-emetic reported to be as effective as parenteral anti-emetics, was launched Japan in 1998. Here, We report a comparison of the effectiveness between Kytril® infusion and Navoban® capsules, in terms of the grade of anorexia, nausea and emesis, measurement of Performance Status, and evaluation using a QOL questionnaire. Twenty oral cancer patients that received chemotherapy with CDDP and 5-FU were enrolled in the study. Our study clarified that oral anti-emetics exerted anti-anorectic, and anti-emetics effects as potently as parenteral drugs.
Content from these authors
© JAPANESE SOCIETY OF ORAL THERAPEUTICS AND PHARMACOLOGY
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top