Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Method Controversy in the Social Sciences

Abstract

In the field of social sciences, controversy over methods pertaining to quantitative and qualitative research has ensued since the late 1990s. In response to the assertion that quantitative methodology is more scientific than qualitative methodology, qualitative researchers continue to refine their own methodology in the process of rebuttal. The purpose of this paper is to focus on a Qualitative Comparison Analysis (QCA), which is part of debate over the use of these new methodologies. By examining this method controversy in the social science, we find positive significance in diversifying the methodological studies that are currently advancing in the field of sociology.

The structure of this paper includes the following outline. In Chapter 1 and 2, we discuss the issues about the Method Controversy in the Social Sciences which is related to the framework of quantitative and qualitative research. The argument will move to an examination of QCA methodology in Chapter 3. In turn, this will lead in Chapter 4 to a thorough study of how conflicted between the quantitative methodologists and the advocates of QCA are in terms of defining the two approaches. Through a summary of the evidence presented in the previous chapters, these methodologies reveal a deep-rooted problem. This extends not only to differences in technique but also to the world-view based on methodology, which could be considered a tradeoff between them. Chapter 5 will conclude by summarizing the findings of this study and seeks to explain the contribution to the current climate associated with the diversification in sociological methodology.