Kansenshogaku Zasshi
Online ISSN : 1884-569X
Print ISSN : 0387-5911
ISSN-L : 0387-5911
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Fosfomycin (FOM) and Kanamycin (KM) in Bacillary Dysentery by Double Blind Method
Ko HIRAISHIYoshio MATSUBARAIsao TOMIZAWAShinichiro UKAITatsu IIMURAHiroshi WADATakehisa SEOMakoto SAITOYatsuka IMAGAWAKojiro MISUNOTamae NAGAIFumio SUZUKIMisako MURATAChizuko EDARyoji TAKAHASHITeiji KATOHide TANAKATsuyoshi YAMAGUCHITokuo YANAGISHITANagayo SHIMIZUYukiyoshi KAMISAKAGota MASUDATaro YAJIMAJuji HOSHINOTetsuzo TOTANIFukiko AMANOKoji KATOChie NAKAMURAYoshio KOBAYASHIChihiro IMAITetsuo ONOShigehiko SUGIYAMAHiroshi HASHIMOTOMitsuru AKAOOkisuke TSUNODATadakazu AISAKAShigeki TANIAkinobu FUJIIHiroshi ZENYOJITakeshi TERAYAMAHideo NORIKI
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1980 Volume 54 Issue 7 Pages 343-352

Details
Abstract

A double blind study was performed using kanamycin (KM) as the control drug in order to make a strict objective evaluation of the efficacy and usefulness of fosfomycin (FOM) in the treatment of bacillary dysentery patients or carriers. The following results were obtained.
1.The MICs of FOM for 116 strains isolated from patients of this series distributed in a range between 0.2 and 25 μg/ml. None of the strains showed resistance to FOM, while there were 2 strains which were found resistant to KM.
2.With respect to the efficacy for symptoms, little or no significant difference was seen between the two groups, although the number of days required for disappearance of blood in stool was shorter for FOM group than for KM group with significant difference.
3.In both groups, good results were obtained for eradication of organisms. In particular, the efficacy rate of 100% recorded for patients of FOM group was higher significantly than that of 85.7% recorded for those of KM group.
4.All of the side effects observed were mild in nature, and no significant difference was seen in their incidences between the two groups. The examination of blood picture, liver and renal functions revealed little or no influences from treatment with either drug, although in one case of FOM group a slight elevation in S-GPT was seen.
From these results, FOM is considered to be a drug very useful in the treatment of patients with bacillary dysentery or carriers.

Content from these authors
© The Japansese Association for Infectious Diseases
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top