Katakansetsu
Online ISSN : 1881-6363
Print ISSN : 0910-4461
ISSN-L : 0910-4461
Dislocations
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair using Suture Anchor
- A Comparison between with and without Rotator Interval Closure -
Yusuke IWAHORI, Makoto KATO, Tomoaki OSUGA, Yukihiro KAJITA, Keiji SATO, Hirokatsu HANAMURA, Motomu TSUTSUI
Author information
JOURNAL RESTRICTED ACCESS

2009 Volume 33 Issue 2 Pages 289-292

Details
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the minimum 2-year-follow-up result of arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchor (ASB) for traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability and made a comparison of the result between the with and without arthroscopic rotator interval closure (ASRIC). We retrospectively studied 105 shoulders of 103 patients. There were 71 male and 32 female patients. The average age at operation was 24.1 years old. 71 shoulders underwent ASB (group S), and 34 shoulders underwent ASB and ASRIC together (groupR). A comparison of the clinical results between with (group S) and without ASRIC (group R) was made. Postoperatively, 6 shoulders (8.5%) in group S and 3 shoulders (8.8%) in group R experienced recurrences. At the time of the final follow-up, the average loss of external rotation was 7.9° in group S and 11.4° in group R with the arm at the side, and 6.3° in group S and 7.8° in group R with the arm in 90° of abduction. The averaged Japanese Shoulder Society shoulder instability score (JSS-IS score) changed from 50.2 before surgery to 94.7 after surgery in group S, from 48.3 before surgery to 93.8 in group R. No significant differences were observed in the recurrence rate, shoulder ROM and JSS-SI score at the time of the final follow- up between group S and R. Rotator interval closure did not affect the result of arthroscopic Bankart repair.
Content from these authors
© 2009 Japan Shoulder Society
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top