Abstract
Extended producer responsibility (EPR) has been an important concept in recycling/waste management policy throughout the world. The diverse perceptions of EPR have, however, caused intense friction within policy dialogue. The author explained the confusion that has arisen in policy dialogue as a result of these diverse perceptions of EPR, and outlined different perception of aims, rationales, application of EPR, and ambitions and policy approaches for introducing EPR programs. Moving forward with policy dialogue in the future will require cautious consideration of 1) use of the term “EPR”; 2) creation of a positive policy arena toward EPR-relevant actions along with monitoring of EPR programs; 3) clarification of discussion points; and 4) allocation of stakeholders′ roles based on the aims and effectiveness of the EPR program to be introduced. Finally, the author argued several points of concern regarding the expansion of the scope of EPR policy in Japan, as recommended by OECD, raising five specific products as examples, which were solar panels, batteries, ships, difficult-to-treat waste, and diapers.
