Igaku Kyoiku / Medical Education (Japan)
Online ISSN : 2185-0453
Print ISSN : 0386-9644
ISSN-L : 0386-9644
Results of a Survey on the Present Status of Undergraduate Clinical Training and Plans for Its Improvement
Rikio TOKUNAGAIsamu SAKURAINobutaro BANTsuguya FUKUIMasaharu HORIGUCHIHisaaki IKOMAKazuoki KODERATadahiko KOZUHayato KUSAKATakao MORITAKatsuji OGUCHIAkitsugu OJIMASusumu TANAKAYoshimasa UMESATOYasuo UCHIYAMAMotokazu HORI
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1997 Volume 28 Issue 4 Pages 197-203

Details
Abstract

We used questionnaires to study the present status of undergraduate clinical training at medical schools in Japan in February 1996. Completed questionnaires were returned by 81%(65) of 80 medical schools and approximately 54%(1, 328 clinical departments) of the schools. The results were as follows. Courses for early clinical exposure in the 1st or 2nd year were provided at 83% of the 65 schools; clinical clerkships in the 5th and 6th years were provided at 28%. Specific behavioral objectives for clinical training were clearly shown to students and teaching staff at 75% of schools. Clinical procedures that medical students were permitted to perform were listed and announced to students and teaching staffs at 66% of schools. Patients were informed and gave consent for clinical training of students at 77% of schools. Essential knowledge and skills of students were assessed before the start of clinical training at 40% of schools, and summative assessment was made at the end of the training at 72%. Training of clinical teaching staff for faculty development was conducted at 51% of schools. Eightynine percent of schools reported a shortage of clinical teaching staff. Similar results were obtained in the survey of clinical departments of university hospitals: most departments complained of a shortage of teaching staff, of students not being active, and of students not being competent to enter clinical training courses. To improve clinical training, the introduction of clinical clerkships and cooperation with community facilities outside universities were the main issues.

Content from these authors
© Japan Society for Medical Education
Next article
feedback
Top