2020 Volume 97 Pages 181-199
Popular cultural content is transnational, as it is produced across national
borders. However, it is used as a tool to represent national image and identity
for branding, which is contradictory. Therefore, two issues will become the
subject of discussion: signifying the processes of policy makers and the
effects of these discourses on people’s national identity. This study examines
these issues through document analysis of Korean government publications
concerning Korean popular music( K-Pop).
The study shows that K-Pop signifies two different things in these
documents.
Documents written in English say that it is “hybrid and transnational
music” for external branding, whereas those in Korean claim that it has
“original content, inheriting Korea-ness from traditional culture” for internal
branding.
In addition, the government’s view of national identity and cultural
nationalism shown in internal branding is not considered by the Korean
people in their reactions to discourse about the Korean wave or change of
governance. This rejection of this reconstructed national identity differs from
the circumstances shown in previous studies.