Neurotraumatology
Online ISSN : 2434-3900
The Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank Project 2004 (Original Article)
Recent trends of severe head injury in Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank with special reference to road traffic accident: Comparison of clinical features and outcome between Project 1998 and Project 2004
Junichi OnoTetsuya SakamotoTatsuro KawamataTakashi TokutomiTakeki OgawaMinoru ShigemoriAkira YamauraNorio Nakamura
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2009 Volume 31 Issue 2 Pages 122-130

Details
Abstract

This study was conducted to clarify the recent trends of severe head injury in the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank (JNTDB) with special reference to traffic accident.

In the JNTDB, the number of severely head-injured patients (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 8 or less) were 832 in Project 1998 and 797 in Project 2004. Those were divided into 2 groups: traffic accident (TA) group, and non-TA (nTA) group. In addition, the former group was classified into 4 groups: 4 wheel vehicle (4WV) group, motorcycle (MC) group, bicycle (BC) group, and pedestrian (P) group. Analyzed here were cause of injury, age distribution, incidence of alcohol intake, means of transportation, clinical severity (GCS and injury severity score), initial CT findings (Traumatic Coma Data Bank), and outcome at discharge (Glasgow Outcome Scale).

Results: In the Project 2004; 1) Traffic accident was less common as the cause of injury. 2) The proportion of younger patients was lower in the TA group, especially in the 4WV and MC groups. 3) Incidence of alcohol intake was lower in the TA group, particularly in the MC groups. 4) Patient transfer by helicopter was more common in both the TA and nTA groups. 5) The proportion of GCS of 3 to 5 was lower in the TA group, especially in the MC group. 6) In the initial CT findings, type 3 of diffuse injury and evacuated mass were less frequent in both groups, and in the 4WV, BC, and P groups. 7) Outcome at discharge: Mortality rate was lower in both groups, and in the 4WV, MC and P groups, but the percentage of good outcomes was unchanged.

These results indicated the recent trends of severely head-injured patients who were injured by traffic accident. But there were some problems, such as study protocol and meaningless results, so that further verification is indispensable in the JNTDB study.

Content from these authors
© 2009 The Japan Society of Neurotraumatology
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top