Orthopedics & Traumatology
Online ISSN : 1349-4333
Print ISSN : 0037-1033
ISSN-L : 0037-1033
A Comparative Study of Intramedullary Hip Screw (IMHS) and Compression Hip Screw (CHS) for Trochanteric Fractures
Kan NagashimaKazuhito Minamitani
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1997 Volume 46 Issue 2 Pages 536-540

Details
Abstract
We discussed the clinical results of trochanteric fractures which were treated with Intramedullary Hip Screw (IMHS) and Compression Hip Screw (CHS). In a total of 69 cases (19 males, 50 females), the fracture type was assessed by the Evans' classifcation system. 24 cases (2 stable and 22 unstable types) were treated with IMHS from February 1994 to July 1995. 45 cases (9 stable and 36 unstable types) were treated with CHS from May 1992 to January 1994.
Considering mean surgicaly time, mean intraoperative blood loss, and mean post operative transfusion, IMHS seemed to show more operative disadvantages for the patients than CHS.
In stable fractures, the postoperative mean sliding amount of the lag screws was about the same in both groups. However in unstable fractures, the amount was obviously less in the case of IMHS than in that of CHS. Because of the rigid fixation, IMHS allowed for early weight-bearing, short periods of bed-rest, and an expected good post operative result. The clinical results were better in the IMHS group than in the CHS group.
Content from these authors
© West-Japanese Society of Orthopedics & Traumatology
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top