1998 Volume 30 Issue 1 Pages 30-37
We studied the topography of somatosensory event-related potentials (SERP) in two different attentive conditions: passive and active. Seventeen healthy right- handed young men, aged 19 to 28 years old (average age; 22.9 years), were requested to perform the following four paradigms in turn. In the passive attentive paradigm, participants were given no specific task when 0.3 Hz electrical stimuli were at random delivered to the right median nerve. In the active attentive paradigm, subjects were required to direct their attention to the regular 0.3 Hz stimuli with all their might. In the control paradigm, 2.0 Hz stimuli were delivered as they listened to their favorite music. Finally, in the oddball paradigm, subjects were instructed to push a button whenever they detected rare stimuli. SERP was recorded at 13 electrodes. Grand average topographic amplitude maps from the individual data of the seventeen subjects were made at the latencies of N 60, P 90, N 130 and P 250 for each of the four paradigms.
The topographic maps of P 250, the largest positive peak between 200 and 300msec after the stimuli, showed a significant difference in the distribution of amplitude in the passive and active attentive paradigms compared to the control paradigm. A statistically significant enhancement was noted at the central region in the passive attention, and at the central and frontal regions in the active attention.
These results suggest that P 250 consists of two attentive components distinct from selective or discriminative attention. The enhanced positivity at the frontal region during active attention may be associated with expecting the next stimulus and maintaining awareness.
