2020 Volume 65 Issue 2 Pages 73-89
In 1932, Japanese physicist, Shohei Tanaka (1862-1945) invented a Japanese just intonation reed organ (hereafter J-JIRO) which improved upon his German JIRO (i.e. Enharmonium) designs.
In his main work, The Foundations of Japanese Harmony(1940), Tanaka classified JI into “JI”,
“authentic-JI”, and “broad-JI”. It is unclear, however, which of these he had in mind for his J-JIRO
design.
From this work, I have inferred that the Enharmonium does not produce enough harmonic sevenths because of its “authentic-JI” design. And thus, Tanaka designed a J-JIRO which does produce
enough harmonic sevenths. Primarily by examining this inference, I will clarify which JI type he had
in mind for his J-JIRO design.
First, I outlined how 53-JI and its close approximation, 53 equal temperament, form the basis
for Tanaka’s tuning theory. Then I showed that the J-JIRO is not tuned to JI, but to 1/8 schisma temperament, which goes against conventional thinking. Next, I analyzed 31 tones, from 21 Japanese
“JI” reed organ keys. This analysis confirmed that the J-“JI”RO produces 5 more “harmonic sevenths”
than the Enharmonium. These 5 are an approximation of the harmonic seventh’s (7:4) substitute
interval (225:128). Lastly, my research strongly suggests that he had “authentic-JI” (5-limit
JI) in mind for the Enharmonium—to which, I theorized in an earlier paper, 53-ET was applied—
and “broad-JI”( 7-limit JI) for the J-“JI”RO.
Tanaka had a type of JI in mind for the J-“JI”RO, which was different from the Enharmonium JI.
A significant reason for this difference could be that he, through his study of traditional Japanese
music, along with musicologist Hisao Tanabe and others, cultivated an ear for intervals which do not
fit into the framework of Western harmonic theory. The concrete verification of this is a subject for
future research.