Progress of Digestive Endoscopy
Online ISSN : 2187-4999
Print ISSN : 1348-9844
ISSN-L : 1348-9844
Clinical study
Assessment of morphological diagnosis by EUS and WHO classification in PNET
Masafumi WatanabeKosuke OkuwakiMitsuhiro KidaHiroshi YamauchiShiro MiyazawaTomohisa IwaiHiroshi ImaizumiWasaburo Koizumi
Author information
Keywords: EUS, PNET
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2016 Volume 88 Issue 1 Pages 78-79

Details
Abstract
Study objective : We retrospectively studied the relations between the findings of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in our hospital.
Patients and Methods : We studied 79 lesions in 78 patients with pancreatic NETs diagnosed at Kitasato University Hospital. EUS findings (1. tumor form, 2. tumor margin, 3. internal echo, 4. echogenicity, 5. cystic changes, 6. tumor size) were contrasted with the WHO classification and retrospectively studied on the basis of the patients’ case report forms.
Results : The results of EUS were as follows : 1. Tumor form round/nodular : 68/11, 2. Tumor margin regular/irregular : 60/19, 3. Internal echo homogeneous/heterogeneous : 49/30, 4. Echogenicity hypoechoic/isoechoic : 58/21, 5. Cystic changes yes/no : 16/63, 6. Tumor size median : 20 mm (2-220 mm) . According to the 2010 WHO classification, grade 2 NETs and neuroendocrine carcinomas were significantly nodular (p<0.01) , more irregular (p<0.01) , more heterogeneous (p<0.01) , and larger (p<0.01) than grade 1 NETs.
Conclusions : Our findings showed that EUS findings are useful for differentiating grade 1 NETs from grade 2 NETs and neuroendocrine carcinomas.
Fullsize Image
Content from these authors
© 2016 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society Kanto Chapter
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top