Surgery for Cerebral Stroke
Online ISSN : 1880-4683
Print ISSN : 0914-5508
ISSN-L : 0914-5508
Topics: Treatment Strategy for Severe Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Prognostic Factors of Severe Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Yoji KOMATSUManabu AKIMOTOHiroyoshi AKUTSUHiroshi KIMURAYasushi NAGATOMO
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2006 Volume 34 Issue 6 Pages 415-419

Details
Abstract
We retrospectively analyzed 130 consecutive patients in Hunt and Kosnik Grade IV to V with ruptured intracranial aneurysm to investigate factors relating to unfavorable outcome.
The outcome at 2 months after on-set was evaluated according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale. GR and MD were defined as favorable outcome, but SD, VS, and D were considered unfavorable. Aneurysms in the anterior circulation of Willis circle were clipped surgically, and GDC embolization was performed in posterior circulation. Patients having normal brain stem reactions and spontaneous respiration were considered suitable for treatment of aneurysms.
Favorable outcomes were seen in 50.8% of Grade IV, and 8.5% of grade V patients. Treating methods—clipping or GDC—were not significant for favorable outcome. Cerebral infarction due to vasospasm, age of over 70 years old and hydrocephalus were significant for unfavorable outcome in Grade IV. GCS scores of 3, 4, and 5 were significant for unfavorable outcome in Grade V.
More sensitive monitoring and aggressive treatment of vasospasm, and active rehabilitation with safely managed cisternal drainage are necessary for more favorable outcomes.
Content from these authors
© 2006 by The Japanese Society on Surgery for Cerebral Stroke
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top