Surgery for Cerebral Stroke
Online ISSN : 1880-4683
Print ISSN : 0914-5508
ISSN-L : 0914-5508
Topics: Coil Embolization
Consideration of Recanalization Risk Factors after Coil Embolization for Intracranial Aneurysms
Hidenori OISHIMunetaka YAMAMOTOKensaku YOSHIDATakashi SHIMIZUHajime ARAI
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2009 Volume 37 Issue 6 Pages 447-452

Details
Abstract

We retrospectively reviewed our own experiences of coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms regarding recanalization. Between July 2001 and December 2007, a total of 740 patients underwent coil embolization at our institution or affiliated hospitals. Among those, 271 patients with 278 aneurysms who underwent follow-up cerebral angiography more than 12 months after the initial treatment were the subjects of this study.
Immediate angiographic results showed complete occlusion in 72.4%, residual neck in 14.0%, and residual filling in 13.6%. Mean follow-up periods were 21.7 and 20.6 months for ruptured and unruptured aneurysms, respectively. The overall recanalization rate was 29.4% (major recurrence 12.6%, minor recurrence 16.8%). Previous rupture and morphology of wide-neck (≥4 mm) or large size (≥10 mm) and location of posterior circulation were the significant risk factors of recanalization (P<0.05). Gender, immediate angiographic results and embolization techniques were not statistically significant. Posttreatment bleeding from the coil-embolized aneurysms occurred in only 0.4% of the cases during the study period.
Coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms is proving to be a safe method of protecting aneurysms from rupture. However, endovascularly treated patients, particularly those with recanalization risk factors, should undergo long-term follow-up.

Content from these authors
© 2009 by The Japanese Society on Surgery for Cerebral Stroke
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top