BUTSURI-TANSA(Geophysical Exploration)
Online ISSN : 1881-4824
Print ISSN : 0912-7984
ISSN-L : 0912-7984
Tutorial
Rock physics research with application to CO2 geological storage I: CO2 behavior in capillary-dominated region and effects of multi-scale heterogeneity on CO2 trapping
Osamu NishizawaYi ZhangTakuma ItoZiqiu XueTetsuya KogureTamotsu Kiyama
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2016 Volume 69 Issue 2 Pages 127-147

Details
Abstract

 Deep saline aquifer formations are expected to have a large potential for carbon dioxide (CO2) storage. Host rocks of the aquifers are mostly porous sandstones. Laboratory experiments on CO2/brine displacement flow in porous sandstones under aquifer's temperature and pressure conditions are important for better understanding the CO2 trapping mechanism in aquifers. A high resolution X-ray CT scanner gives in situ images of CO2 and brine distributions in porous sandstone. The images give important clues for clarifying mechanisms of CO2 trapping in porous sandstones. In this article, we discuss mechanisms of CO2/brine displacements revealed by employing a high-resolution medical CT scanner, and then in the succeeding article, we discuss changes of seismic velocity during the displacements. Considering the role of capillary pressure in porous sandstone and the inhomogeneity revealed in reservoir rocks by petrological and sedimentological analyses, the following points are important for the CO2 migration and trapping in deep saline aquifers. 1. Locally-biased CO2 flow paths appear during CO2 injection in brine-saturated sandstone because the fine-scaled local fluctuation (about mm sizes) in pore-size distribution. 2. In simultaneous flow of CO2 and brine, tapping and flow behaviors of CO2 depend on the directional relationship between anisotropy in porosity distribution and flow direction. 3. The above phenomena arise from slight differences in capillary pressure accompanied by differences in pore size distributions. 4. Flow and trapping of CO2 are governed by sizes of CO2 clusters in pore spaces. 5. Sizes of CO2 clusters in pores are different between the processes of CO2 injection and brine reinjection. 6. Heterogeneity scales from pore size to geologic structure affect CO2 flow behavior in the reservoir at CO2 storage sites. 7. When fractures or large pore sized channels exist in a reservoir and its surrounding formations, capillary pressure has no effect on CO2 flow.

Content from these authors
© 2016 The Society of Exploration Geophysicists of Japan
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top