The Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Online ISSN : 2188-0808
Print ISSN : 0387-2343
ISSN-L : 0387-2343
Original Articles
Efficacy of Sonic and Ultrasonic Irrigation for the Removal of Calcium Hydroxide Paste in the Root Canal : A Microtomographic Study
Hitomi ISHIMURATakahiro HANADAKei KOMATSUToshihiko YOSHIOKAYoshio YAHATATakatomo YOSHIOKAHideaki SUDA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2012 Volume 55 Issue 5 Pages 328-332

Details
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic irrigation on calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) paste removal and to measure the volume of remaining Ca(OH)2 paste in the root canal with micro-computed tomography scanning (micro-CT). Methods: Twenty-one root canal models (D-mec) were used. These models had two orifices and one apical foramen with two isthmuses positioned 5 and 9 mm from the apex, respectively. All root canal models were filled with Ca(OH)2 paste (Calcipex II, Nihon Shika Yakuhin). After 7 days, the root canal models were randomly divided into one control group (n=7) and two experimental groups (n=7 each). Groups A, B and C were irrigated using a conventional syringe (3.0 ml syringe, Terumo) with a needle (Blunt®, Nipro), a sonic Sally (Yoshida), and an ultrasonic Grand Piezo (Yoshida), respectively. After irrigation (Group A: 30 sec, Groups B and C: 15 sec , the root canal models were scanned using micro-CT (InspeXio SMX100CT®, Shimadzu), and the volume of remaining Ca(OH)2 paste was measured. One-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer were used for statistical analysis (p<0.05). Results: No techniques removed the Ca(OH)2 paste completely from the root canal. Although more remnants of Ca(OH)2 paste remained in Group A (control) than in Groups B and C (p<0.05), there was no significant difference in the volume of Ca(OH)2 paste remnants between Groups B and C. Conclusion: The results indicated that sonic and ultrasonic irrigation were significantly more effective for removing Ca(OH)2 paste from the root canal than manual irrigation. No significant difference was found between Group B (sonic irrigation) and Group C (ultrasonic irrigation).

Content from these authors
© 2012 The Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top