Is the Publication of the Academic Journal “Social Policy and Labor Studies” Sustainable ?

Abstract

This paper examines whether the Japan Association for Social Policy Studies （JASPS） can sustain the publication of its academic journal “Social Policy and Labor Studies” under its current editorial format. An analysis was conducted by reviewing the journal’s current editorial practices and history and comparing them with those of other domestic academic societies and the status quo of journal editing and publishing. The paper highlighted deviations from the policy of focusing on submitted manuscripts, which was implemented with the introduction of the review system. This system has led to a low number of submissions and a bias in submitters. Furthermore, the diversification of publication formats suggests that the publication of “Social Policy and Labor Studies” in its current form is unsustainable. The review system has faced various criticisms due to intense research competition. The crucial question is how to create a system where researchers can collaborate to generate knowledge. The management of academic societies and journals must be thoroughly examined to avoid confusing the essential purpose （advancement of scholarship） with the means （development of organizations or journals）.