Abstract
In the present age when a social and economic situation changes rapidly and technology also evolves, it is said that an actual project is not well manageable, even if using the conventional traditional project management methodology. Namely, these arguments say that it is important to permit changes and complexity and to manage complexity as it is. The center of these arguments is management of complexity. Human factors, such as un-shared goals and goal pass, such as unclear meaning of projects and hidden agenda, are also included in complexity. And in order to make a project successful, it is thought that not the conventional managerial method (planning, command and monitoring and control) but the leadership of PM is more important. In this paper, I consider these arguments from a viewpoint of PM competency, and I discuss the hint of future PM training.
