Tando
Online ISSN : 1883-6879
Print ISSN : 0914-0077
ISSN-L : 0914-0077
Suitability of the phrase “accessory hepatic ducts” evaluated from results of direct cholangiography
Hiroki NAKAMURAHiroaki KINOSHITAKazuhiro HIROHASHIShoji KUBOHiromu TANAKATadashi TSUKAMOTONagahisa FUJIO
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1994 Volume 8 Issue 1 Pages 22-28

Details
Abstract
Patterns of union of bile ducts in the porta hepatis were investigated in 213 patients by direct cholangiography. Hepatic ducts and their proximal ducts in the porta hepatis had a bifurcating pattern in 70%. There was trifurcation in 14%. The right posterior duct joined the common hepatic duct in 5%, and the right posterior duct joined the left hepatic duct in 11%. In two patients (1%) with the bifurcating pattern, the inferior posterior right hepatic duct arose from the porta hepatis at the right hepatic duct. Another two patients (1%) with the bifurcating pattern had variant union at the porta hepatis. Such variations have been called accessory hepatic ducts; however, they can be thought of instead simply as unusual patterns of union. The term “accessory” is misleading, because these ducts have the same drainage functions as normal hepatic ducts. “Accessory” hepatic ducts could be better termed “variant” hepatic ducts.
Content from these authors
© Japan Biliary Association
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top