The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College
Print ISSN : 0040-8891
Case or Clinical Report
CLINICOSTATISTICAL STUDY OF AMELOBLASTOMA TREATMENT
KEN-ICHI HATADAHIROYASU NOMAAKIRA KATAKURAMITSURU YAMAMASAYUKI TAKANOYOSHINORI IDETAKASHI TAKAKIYASUTOMO YAJIMATAKAHIKO SHIBAHARATAKASHI KAKIZAWAMORIO TONOGIGEN-YUKI YAMANE
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2001 Volume 42 Issue 2 Pages 87-95

Details
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the treatment of 190 cases of ameloblastoma in our department from 1966 to 1994. The statistical results with regard to age, sex and region agreed with those of other investigators. Thirty-five of 43 (81.4%) cases underwent enucleation in 1960s, but the sixteen of 27 (59.3%) cases underwent partial resection of mandible in 1990s. The defect of mandible was reconstructed with iliac bone grafting since 1968, grafts with a mixture of iliac blocked bone and PCBM (particulate cancellous bone and marrow) have been used since 1975. Grafting of the inferior alveolar nerve with the great auricular nerve to the defect has been performed in our department since 1977. Recently, technique involving pull-through of the inferior alveolar nerve bundle has been used in our department. When the reconstruction method for the mandible and nerve has been established, it becomes possible to operate radically and positively. Recurrence occurred in 17 cases after the primary enucleation. It is thought that the primary treatment of ameloblastoma must be as radical as possible. It appears to be necessary to observe progress and perform follow-up in cases of ameloblastoma for more than ten years, because there was one recurrence at 9 years and 4 months after the first operation. In fact, three quarters of our cases were lost to follow-up. Such losses can problems in confirming recurrence and responding rapidly.

Content from these authors
© 2001 by Tokyo Dental College, Japan
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top