Purpose: The aim of this study was to validate positron emission tomography feature tracking (PETFT) for assessing endocardial wall strain by comparing it with conventional tagging-cine magnetic resonance (MR) derived strain analysis (TAG).
Methods: Consecutive 62 patients who underwent
13N-ammonia PETMR (52 males, mean age 66 years) were enrolled. PETFT and TAG were obtained through simultaneous acquisition with electrocardiography-gated PET and cine-MR for rest scan. Global longitudinal and circumferential strain (GLS and GCS) were calculated. Correlations and Bland-Altman plots were employed to evaluate associations, bias, and 95% limit of agreement (LOA) between PETFT and TAG.
Results: PETFT and TAG showed significant correlations (
r = 0.69 [95% CI: 0.54 to 0.80], p<0.0001;
r = 0.55 [95% CI: 0.33–0.80], p<0.0001 for GCS and GLS, respectively). Bland-Altman plot showed acceptable agreements (Bias 0.7±6.7, LOA -12.5 to 13.9; Bias 1.3±5.5, LOA -9.5 to 12.0 for GCS and GLS, respectively). In patients with abnormal perfusion, the correlations were still significant (
r = 0.76 [95% CI: 0.62 to 0.93], p<0.0001;
r = 0.59 [95% CI: 0.18 to 0.82], p=0.007 for GCS and GLS, respectively)
Conclusion: PETFT has been identified as a feasible technique compared to TAG, demonstrating its potential as a novel tool for assessing wall strain in routine clinical practice. However, discrepancies in strain values may arise due to differences in algorithms and the presence of perfusion defects.
View full abstract