Summary
Introduction
Crossmatch testing is mandatory in kidney transplantation. The techniques are largely classified into direct and virtual crossmatches. In Japan, direct crossmatch is performed, comprising a complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC) and a flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM).
Sensitivity is a concern with CDC, whereas FCXM has problems such as the false positivity of non-HLA antibodies. We studied the clinical usefulness of the FlowDSA-XM assay, which allows for crossmatching with fluorescent microbeads using a flow cytometer produced by One Lambda, Inc.
Methods
The following were performed: (1) comparison of the two techniques, the conventional technique and FlowDSA-XM; (2) investigation of the initial setting of the flow cytometer; and (3) determination of the effect of coexisting substances (free bilirubin, conjugated bilirubin, hemolytic hemoglobin, and chyle).
Results
As the initial device setting varies according to model, careful setting is required. The agreement rates between the conventional crossmatch and FlowDSA-XM were 96% (57/59 patients) for class 1 and 93% (55/59) for class 2. Data disagreement was confirmed in 10% (6/59) for classes 1 and 2 combined. We performed a LABScreen Single Antigen assay and assumed that the deviation of the result from that obtained using the conventional technique was attributed to the fact that the patients showed results within the indeterminant range and to the reaction of non-HLA antibodies. The effect of coexisting substances was mostly favorable.
Conclusion
The FlowDSA-XM assay showed a good agreement rate with the conventional technique and comparable results. It can accurately confirm donor-specific antibodies and is a highly accurate method.
View full abstract